Post by jabinkhatun908 on Feb 27, 2024 3:33:06 GMT
In this case all existing sectors Kirchnerism, Albertism and Massism will agree to resolve the leadership question through internal elections whether public simultaneous and mandatory primary steps or other types. This choice implies an effort to escape the current deadlock that bets on transforming Peronism into a bureaucratic party which it has never been so far. Such a thing seems unlikely to happen these days because whoever loses is automatically out of the running for the presidency. Alberto Fernandez has said he will push for that path with him as a rival but the chances of a deal seem slim.
The second scenario is that Alberto just as Néstor Kirchner did with Eduardo Duhalde in 2001 and ultimately establishes Albertism. There are no doubt some people close to the president who have advised him to take Finland Phone Number List this path but Fernandez himself seems reluctant to do so. Would you win if you did this? Indeed it would have the support of some unions some governors and mayors and maybe social movements and maybe even some business people. But Néstor Kirchner challenged Duhalde after growing economically and amassing huge popularity. Neither situation exists today both due to factors beyond the administration’s control and to errors of its own making, such as the meeting held at the presidential residence during quarantine to celebrate the First Lady’s birthday.
The third scenario is where Kirchnerism denounces the government and ultimately breaks with it. Such a thing is not impossible and may even be inevitable. It is difficult to imagine how the alliance will continue after Kirchnerite opposition to a deal with the IMF. But it is also almost impossible to imagine how this could continue if Kirchnerism deepens its break with the government. The fourth situation is the unpleasant coexistence of stagnation, resentment, and mutual accusations. The events of the previous months only seemed to confirm the fact that neither Alberto Fernandez, Cristina Fernandez nor her son Maximo Kirchner were able or wanted to break the logic of the ongoing conflict without a public break.
The second scenario is that Alberto just as Néstor Kirchner did with Eduardo Duhalde in 2001 and ultimately establishes Albertism. There are no doubt some people close to the president who have advised him to take Finland Phone Number List this path but Fernandez himself seems reluctant to do so. Would you win if you did this? Indeed it would have the support of some unions some governors and mayors and maybe social movements and maybe even some business people. But Néstor Kirchner challenged Duhalde after growing economically and amassing huge popularity. Neither situation exists today both due to factors beyond the administration’s control and to errors of its own making, such as the meeting held at the presidential residence during quarantine to celebrate the First Lady’s birthday.
The third scenario is where Kirchnerism denounces the government and ultimately breaks with it. Such a thing is not impossible and may even be inevitable. It is difficult to imagine how the alliance will continue after Kirchnerite opposition to a deal with the IMF. But it is also almost impossible to imagine how this could continue if Kirchnerism deepens its break with the government. The fourth situation is the unpleasant coexistence of stagnation, resentment, and mutual accusations. The events of the previous months only seemed to confirm the fact that neither Alberto Fernandez, Cristina Fernandez nor her son Maximo Kirchner were able or wanted to break the logic of the ongoing conflict without a public break.